Sermons at St. John’s Presbyterian Church2727 College Avenue Berkeley, California 94705(510) 845-6830 An Honest Heart
Transcribed
from the sermon preached August 26, 2012 The
Reverend Max Lynn, Pastor
Scripture Readings: Ps.24, Ephesians 6:10-20, Matt 15: 10-20If
our salvation depended on our being perfectly honest, then we would be
inclined
to hide our dishonest, even from ourselves. The good news is that our
salvation
comes by the grace of God through Christ. This truth gives us the
liberty to
take an honest look at ourselves ad cultural values and prejudice,
which we
begin internalizing at birth, to honestly confess our ignorance and
sin, and be
the power of the Holy Spirit to grow beyond them. I have to admit
that this passage in Matthew is troubling. For after the discovery of
germ
theory in the late 19th century, we know that
what goes into our mouth
does in fact defile us. So for all of his amazing words and actions
which seem
to lift Jesus out of the limitations of historical knowledge and
culture, this
one seems to show limits to his knowledge. Even if the purity laws of
the
Hebrews served a cultural and class definition of who was in and who
was out,
who were God’s people and who was not, rather than their understanding
of the
transmission of disease, the washing rituals no doubt also contributed
to a
decrease in transmission of disease. With my discomfort
revealed, we can cut Jesus some slack because his main point holds
true:
Spiritual cleanliness is determined by what comes out of our heart and
mind.
Cleanliness is often a luxury of the leisured classes who don’t have to
work
with dirt or filth and can afford soaps and baths and changes of
clothes, and
people to do their work. Gandhi, defying the idea that there were
certain jobs
that made certain castes of people untouchable, revolted against the
cast
system by cleaning latrines. Jesus washed feet and told us to do the
same. A
caste system, which deemed some people worthy of privilege and others
as
untouchable, needed cleaning out of society and out of our minds. There are many
sources to our cultural bias and prejudice against those of us who
perform
dirty labor, but, like all prejudice, it is not something easily
cleaned out of
our mind, regardless of where we fit in the story. Prejudices of all
kinds,
racism, sexism, classism, xenophobia, tend to be interwoven in our
minds. They
are part of the cultural ocean we swim, eat and breath in, indeed, like
our
prayer of confession implies, it is sin of the world we are born into.
“We are
brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.”
Prejudice is
a part of how we see ourselves and the world. Our prejudices are much
larger
than certain individuals and groups who most overtly display them, and
don’t
simply disappear from within us because we want them to, or because we
don’t
want to admit that they work within us too. It would be convenient if
the
source of our troubles could be located in certain individuals or
groups,
whether the KKK or dirty people, people on welfare or the 1%,
fundamentalist
Jews, Muslims or Christians. It would be convenient because we wouldn’t
have to
take a look at our own dishonesty, how we continue to contain our
cultures’
prejudices within us, how we are dirty, how we have benefited from
handouts,
how we have indulged and sought our own interest, how we fear others.
Paul says
our struggle is not just against flesh and blood…but cosmic powers of
this
present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly
places.
Jesus asks us to take the log out of our own eye before we take the
speck out
of our neighbor’s. “Reinhold Neibuhr points
out the dishonesty
of the privileged classes. “The moral attitudes of dominant and
privileged
groups are characterized by universal self-deception and hypocrisy…
Since
inequalities of privilege are greater than could possibly be defended
rationally, the intelligence of privileged groups is usually applied to
the
task of inventing specious proofs for the theory that universal values
spring
from, and that general interests are served by, the special privileges
which
they hold.” Culture tends to
base privilege on the claim of moral superiority. The poor and
marginalized, so
our thinking goes, are lazy and break the law, they lack intelligence
and
manners, they are unclean. We see a dark skinned man with a cloth or
sweatshirt
covering his head and think radical Muslim or criminal. We encounter a
man with
AIDs and think he is gay. Privileged or Dominant individuals and
groups, when
they encounter another group or individual from a minority or
marginalized
group, and notice one of these traits which hold negative value, will
attribute
all the other negative values to them almost automatically and
unconsciously.
When the tendency to think negatively is stuck inside of us, it spills
out and
we project the negative values onto others. Our cultural cup may appear
clean
of prejudice from outward appearance, but the inside remains unclean. One of the things
we have to do to fight the cosmic power of the present darkness is to
check our
judgments with an internal affirmative action, or to put it Jesus way,
take the
log our of your own eye before we take the speck out of our neighbor.
When we
find ourselves speared from within by a negative reaction or judgment
of
another, we check our feelings with the Spirit, reason, truth,
righteousness,
peace, faith and the Word of God. We put on the Spiritual armor to be
protected
from both internal and external attack. For instance, the
first few times a gay man tried to pick me up, my first reaction was to
be
offended. This is not an uncommon reaction in straight men, or men who
want to
think of themselves as straight. We have to think about it, and as
Jesus
suggests, be less concerned with what we put in our body and more
concerned
with what comes out. We ask ourselves, why was I offended by his
interest in me
or in another male? Well, it was strange, and it is a natural human
tendency to
be shocked by something radically different than what we are used to.
But
strange doesn’t necessarily mean bad or immoral, so we have to check
our
reaction on that count. Perhaps we are offended that he dares not see
me as too
masculine to be approachable. How dare he even consider the possibility
that I
am gay? But here again we have to catch ourselves: self confidence in
one’s
sexuality, especially our culture’s definition of self confident
masculinity,
should enable one to not be easily swayed by the opinions or actions of
others;
therefore maybe our offense reveals our own doubt in our own
masculinity. Thus
in confident masculinity, we should not allow a man’s attraction or
lack of
attraction to offend us. Perhaps some of
the common negative reaction of men being approached by a gay man stems
from a
fear of violation. Indeed, there may be a gut level counter-reaction of
aggression or even violence, a sense that a man has to hold his ground,
reject
any affront and block any signs there may be penetrable weakness to our
masculine armor. It is still strange for a male to be pursued rather
than lured
or enticed, to be chased rather than to chase. Now here we have a check
on
gender values: there does seem to be a biological component to the fact
that
men are attracted to the sexuality of a woman like Winnie the Pooh to
honey,
but are bears therefore better than honey because the bear goes after
it? Is
being the aggressor morally or existentially superior to being the one
pursued?
And are men then morally obligated to claim the superior aggression and
women
inferior for being pursued, and obligated to stay in their place and
not
pursue? If we are for the equality of women then roles of pursuer and
pursued
cannot hold unequal moral value. If there is something offensive about
being
pursued, then are we not relegating most women to an inferior role? If
there is
not a moral difference between male and female, nor between the pursuer
and the
pursued, then we men ought to be able, not just to not be offended, but
to
appreciate and accept the joy and blessing of pursuing and enticing,
giving and
receiving from whichever sex. This doesn’t mean we have to be militant
in
equality in execution of roles, just that playing one role doesn’t make
you
morally inferior or superior. We seek to cleanse the caste system from
our
hearts and minds. In addition, in
our negative reaction to the encounter with the gay man’s pass, If we
are
honest enough with ourselves to acknowledge that part of our negative
reaction
may stem from the fear of violation, we may also gain a greater
understanding
of the fear that women feel on a regular basis, and therefore be more
understanding of the moral obligation in sexual pursuit to be
venturesome
without being impudent or brazen. On the other hand, approaching
someone takes
a tremendous amount of courage because you risk being rejected. If we
are hurt
when a woman responds to our pass with offense, fear, or rejection,
shouldn’t
this make us all the more sympathetic to this man who risks not only
rejection
in a personal encounter but social rejection as well? As Christians, in
our effort to be honest we are not excused to be mean. Last week we heard
from Proverbs 12: [16]
The
vexation of a fool is known at once, This little
exercise in affirmative action in my head soon enabled me to treat a
man who
came onto me as I would like to be treated, at minimum, with a kind and
polite
- no thanks. And just because I
am able to give a polite no thanks, doesn’t mean I have completely
eradicated
the cultural prejudice and fear I have within me. And since it takes
some time
to truly think and pray out our inner thoughts and feelings, as
Christians, if
we are going to err, let us err on the side of grace and kindness. In
an
awkward situation with those we are culturally inclined to trust, they
are
innocent until proven guilty. With those for whom our culture or
subculture is
inclined to mistrust, we will be inclined to act as if they are guilty
until
proven innocent. Being honest and fair is not as easy as wanting to be
honest
and fair. Wanting to be honest is surely an essential good start. If we
rely
too much on our desire to be honest and fair, then we will be inclined
to hide
our prejudice from ourselves. But God knows better. The Good News is
that in our trial before God, though God is justified in thy sentence,
for we
were brought forth in iniquity, through Christ, we know mercy, and our
transgressions are blotted out. This assurance of grace enables us to
remain
open to the truth, to not deny prejudice and inequality, but to
honestly look
at it, to confess it, and to ask to be washed clean. It is by God’s
grace that
we receive truth and honesty in our inward being, and wisdom in our
secret
heart. It is by God’s grace that we know love and peace. We then have to examine
our internal
motivation and prejudice, make adjustments, and by the grace of God,
choose to
the best of our ability and knowledge, the most loving and just way to
be. So continuing with our
theme of honesty, we
remind ourselves of the need to take the log out of our own eye first,
before
we take the speck out of our neighbors, to be more concerned with the
honesty
and origin of our own thoughts and actions than with whether others are
aligned
with our cultural purity codes. Another important point
on the subject of
honesty, or personal honesty, is that we should also beware of outward
focus on
others and society alone, and neglecting our need for internal honesty.
This
goes for all parties, Democrat and Republican, black, white, brown or
pink. I
was recently sent a link from an old hippie to an essay that claimed to
have
the answer to world peace, and it seemed as easy as thinking about it
deeply.
The problem is that this person is having all sorts of trouble with
people in
her own family. Surely if we want to get to world peace, a big part of
the
process is peace in our families. I know a lady who runs around working
on
every cause related to the environment, and accuses big corporations of
not
cleaning up their messes, but her house is so dirty and messy it should
be
declared an environmental hazard. I know a guy who accuses the system
of unfair
treatment, but has lost multiple jobs because he gets high all the
time, shows
up late and looks for ways to not work hard until he gets fired and has
to go
back on welfare or borrow more money from mom. And the mom wants her
son to
grow up and be responsible, but she keeps treating him like a kid. I
know a guy
who thinks government should be cut down to just the military, but
cusses every
time he hits a pot hole and relies on the government to help his
disabled
sister and his out of state mom. Maybe the member of our family with
the dirty
hands, the one with the visible issue, is only part of the problem? How
might
our labeling, lecturing or dismissing be a part of the problem? How can
we
begin to take more responsibility for our own issues, take an honest
look at
the log in our own eye? Taking an honest look
at ourselves, and how
we contribute to the problems in our relationships and our culture is
the most
difficult task we have in life. “The educational
advantages which privilege
buys, and the opportunities for the exercise of authority which come
with
privileged social position, develop capacities which are easily
attributed to
innate endowment. The presence of able men among the privileged is
allowed to
obscure the number of instances in which hereditary privilege is
associated
with knavery and incompetence. On the other hand it has always been the
habit
of privileged groups to deny the oppressed classes every opportunity
for the
cultivation of innate capacities and then to accuse them of lacking
what they
have been denied the right to acquire.” So far in our
discussion of honesty we have
focused primarily on the importance of honesty in society and between
people.
But one of the great tasks within our spiritual journey is to become
honest
with ourselves. It didn’t take psychology to tell us that what goes on
inside
our heart and mind is complex and hard to discern. “I will not let anyone
walk through my mind
with their dirty feet.” |