God's Doggy Day Spa and
the Blessing of Pets
Transcribed
from the
sermon preached October 9, 2011
The Reverend Max Lynn,
Pastor
Scripture
Readings: Matthew 6:25-33, Psalm104:10-25
I can’t resist sharing a little Dave Barry with you again this year:
“Cats are less loyal than dogs, but more
independent. (This is code. It means: "Cats are
smarter than dogs, but they hate people.") Many people love cats. From
time to time, newspapers print stories about some elderly widow who
died and left her entire estate, valued at $3,200,000, to her cat,
Fluffkins. Cats read these stories, too, and are always plotting to get
named as beneficiaries in their owners' wills. Did you ever wonder
where your cat goes when it wanders off for several hours? It meets
with other cats in estate-planning seminars. I just thought you should
know."
“Dogs would make totally incompetent criminals. If you could somehow
get a group of dogs to understand the concept of the Kennedy
assassination, they would all immediately confess to it. Whereas you'll
never see a cat display any kind of guilty behavior, despite the fact
that several cats were seen in Dallas on the Grassy Knoll area, not
that I wish to start rumors.”
Do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink,
or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than
food, and the body more than clothing. Today, Jesus warns us
against anxiety and worry, using plants and animals as an example of
how, worry or not, God provides. Worry will not add time to our life.
While thinking about the sermon this time around, it dawned on me that
pets often become an extension of who we are. I love the 101
dalmations scene at the beginning of the movie when they show all the
dogs with their people; the big bone headed dog for the big bone headed
owner, the short round dog has a short round owner, the prancy primped
poodle has a prancy primped lady owner.
I guess owner is no longer politically correct…what is the proper
word? Pamperer?
These days there are a lot of pampered animals. And it is a
bipartisan affair: Liberals pamper their animals in the guise
of extending love and equality beyond the human species, while
conservatives pamper their animals because they can. Now there is
pampering that shows love and affection and there is pampering that
ignores the needs of others people and life around the world, and the
simple needs of animals. Could it be that all the lavishing
upon our pets may have more to do with our own anxieties and desires,
more with capitalism than the happiness of the animals?
Our dog Sassy is getting a little old and pulled a muscle in her
leg. We took her to the vet. The vet gave her some
pain pills. The visit and the pills cost us $80. We
opted not to do the $400 x ray. The doctor also told me that
Sassy was a bit overweight. Now I am not about to stop
feeding her leftovers. For one, she loves them, and two, that
is what dogs are for. The amount of food thrown out by
Americans is a sin, especially when there is a living, happy garbage
disposal in the back yard. So, we stopped feeding Sassy so
much dog food, and try harder to not forget to walk her, and she has
started to lose some weight.
Did you know that forty percent of pets in the US are
overweight? Like the 101 dalmations, I think our animals are
reflective the people in our culture. But it is not just food
that we lavish upon our pets.
According to the Institute for Canine Studies, “After consumer
electronics, pet care is the fastest-growing category in retail,
expanding about 6% a year over the past decade. “ In 1998 $23
billion was spent on pets. In 2010 spending for pets went up to $47.7
billion. That is over 100% increase in
12years.
http://www.caninestudies.org/about/economic-impact/
The increase in spending is due to a number of factors. Part
of the increase comes from a growth in the number of households who
have pets, up from 56% to 62%. As baby boomer’s kids move
out; they may decide to buy animals. With people getting
married later and the divorce rate so high, there are more single
member households than ever before. And, some of the spending
may be due to an increase in disposable income…but, as the economy has
hit bottom, pet spending has continued to increase. So even
with these factors mentioned above, there has been a huge
increase in spending per animal.
Now in capitalism purchasing anything is good, since when we spend
somebody else makes money, and they then can buy from someone
else. So Paris Hilton and her diamond collared dog are role
models. Don’t get me wron. In the grand scheme of things, there must be
5000 other jobs that are less appreciated by God than pet pamperer.
Just ask Roger Moore, maker of Bowling for Columbine. Heck, ministers
may be further down the list. But somehow I don’t think
diamond dog collars is what Ghandi had in mind when he said, "The
greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way
its animals are treated."
Now in all my searching this week, nobody even hinted that pet spending
may be a little over the top. It is all good and prosperous
as business will testify. There has been a big increase in
designer and luxury goods for pets: Automated food dispensers,
mouthwash and electronic tooth brushes, doggy beauty solons,
monogrammed sweaters, bird manicures. Heck, there are even
doggy psychologists and cats on Prozac. Could it be that we
have projected our anxiety and worry, our addiction to buying
the latest best thing onto our pets? Today, when we look at
the birds of the air we think they need their nails polished.
In an article explaining how business people can tap emotions to get
people to buy things they don’t really need, George Torok ,
author of The Secrets of Power Marketing, says that there are five
things that determine why we buy: we buy out of love, pride, guilt,
fear and greed.
http://www.torok.com/articles/marketing/5EmotionalTriggers.html
As Christians God would ask us to beware of all those motivators except
love. And our love may also be expressed in a poor
way. I may love my son, but that doesn’t mean I need to buy
him every video game that comes out. I may love Sassy the bone headed
dog, but I would be the bone head if I sent her to a doggy
spa. She would be happier if I found her a mud puddle at the
park, and topped that off with a dead bird. For Sassy, that
is God’s doggy spa.
The point is, it is good that we love our animals, but we we need not
project our culture’s materialism upon them as if that is
love. Let them show us how to relax and enjoy the simple life
rather than us showing them how to complicate, stress and consume to
the detriment of the rest of life on the planet.
It has been shown that pets do help make us healthier, reduce stress
and lower blood pressure. They keep us company, protect and
entertain us, and teach us about life.
We bless our pets each year here at St. John’s. Now we might
argue that this is yet another thing we do for ourselves rather than
the needs of our pets. For to the best of our knowledge our
pets are not even aware of God and do not conceive the value of a
spiritual blessing
Yet the psalmist and St. Francis and Jesus suggest that living things,
by their very being and breath, give praise and testimony to the glory
and love of God. Plants and animals, rivers and mountains are
co-participants in the earthly choir. And we ought to feel
good about recognizing the beautiful animals that make our lives
humorous and warm. Asking God to bless our pets brings their
presence and love to the forefront of our conscious. And it
helps us to think about how and why we treat them the way we do, and to
improve our relationship with them. Abraham Lincoln said, "I
care not much for a man's religion whose dog and cat are not the better
for it." We give thanks and open our minds and hearts to the
Spirit of God in all life, for the blessing of animals.