|
Sermons at St. John’s Presbyterian Church Resurrection
from the Tomb of Race and Empire
Transcribed from the
sermon preached March 23, 2008 Easter
The Reverend Max Lynn,
Pastor St. John’s
Presbyterian
Church
2727 College Avenue,
Berkeley, CA 94705
Telephone 510-845-6830 Fax 510-845-6837
Were you there when they nailed him
to the
tree? Were you there when they nailed him to the tree? Sometimes it
causes me
to tremble, tremble, tremble. Were you there when they nailed him to
the tree?
Given that our main worship falls on
Sunday, most of us move from the triumphal entry of Palm Sunday, skip
the dark
night in the garden and the crucifixion, and go right to the joyous
resurrection songs and egg hunts of Easter Sunday. As liberal white
Protestants, I know we are somewhat embarrassed, and would often rather
avoid
the darker sides of Christianity. We are known for wanting to do things
decently and in order, for being what some refer to as the frozen
chosen. But
the tragedy of the cross is not decent and in order. So, I suppose, we
too,
like Christ in the garden, are presented with the option of running
from the
cross, running from the dark side of human history and the soul, or
with faith
in God, facing it square on with both our mind and our soul, with the
hope we
will come out more free and more alive than ever.
So I appreciate your journey with us
last week, as we went from the triumphal entry to the dark night of
Gethsemane.
My attempt to step into Jesus' mind was a first. "Father, if it be your
will, take this cup from me," It left me feeling a little vulnerable, a
little crazy If last week happened to be your first, or one of your
first
Sundays with us, and for some reason you didn't run for dear life,
welcome
back. You are in for the ride of your life.
I believe God is leading the liberal
church, and maybe even our nation, back into the soul of the Gospel
story, into
our own soul and back into the soul of the world. And while at times we
may get
frightened and feel as if we might go down some dark tomb and never
come out,
God has other plans. It may be helpful to trace where our fear comes
from.
Our movement away from the Passion of
Jesus Christ, from the passion of faith, from the expression of fear,
prophetic
anger, grief, expressive celebration and joy is rooted in Puritan and
middle
class desire for decency and order and the Enlightenment value of
rational
thought and efficiency.
In America in particular, we see this
played out in the abolitionist movement that heated up in the 1830's.
As
Southerners went on the offensive, they buttressed their pro-slavery
argument
with numerous proof texts from scripture. The pro-slavery argument
would have
had a rhetorical advantage, but through such people as Albert Barnes, a
professor of Old Testament at the reformed Presbyterian or Union
Theological
Seminary in New York, abolitionists found they could counter the
pro-slavery
advocates' use of scriptural texts by using tools of higher criticism
to
disclose the over-arching theme of salvation history. (Noel)
In the Civil War, as Lincoln noted,
both sides prayed to the same God. "The prayers of both could not be
answered. That of neither has been answered fully." In an essay in the
Passion of our Lord, James Noel notes that "Southerners
interpreted
their defeat to mean not that their cause had been opposed to God's
will but
that they were victims of the godless Northerners and "bestial"
blacks."
"The South's racial mind-set had
inculcated an anti-intellectualism into its ethos... The Scopes Trial
dramatically portrayed the Southern flight from modernity... As the
liberals
embraced modernism, privileging scientific methods and achievements
over
traditional, often religiously based views," emotional expression and
attachment to the stories of scripture, particularly the cross, became
unintelligible to them.
The emphasis of the liberal Social
Gospel enthusiasts on the social ethical implications of the Gospel
reinforced
the tendency already at work in liberal Protestantism to de-emphasize
attachment and emotional connection to the Gospel story and the
salvation
message. Walter Raushenbusch said, for example, "religious morality"
is " the only thing God cares about." Meanwhile the evangelical wing
of Protestantism reacted to the Social Gospel by moving further away
from
social justice concerns.
"Thus," continues Noel,
" the correlation among white Protestants between passion piety and
political conservatism and the absence of such a piety and social
activism can
be traced back to these developments. This correlation cannot be made,
however,
in the case of African American Christians." (Noel, James. Were
you
There? The Passion of Our Lord. Fortress. 2005). We may also note, neither
is this correlation made by the Quiche
of Guatemala or the Christians in Southern Sudan. For them the passion
blends
easily into present reality.
Within the white middle-class psyche,
we would like to retain the idea that humanity, and America, is not so
lost
that we can't fix ourselves, and so we would rather answer no to the
question
of the old African American Spiritual, Were you there when they nailed
him to
the tree? We do not want it to cause us to tremble. And within the
liberal
branch of white Protestantism, we fear that if we release our grasp of
rational
thought, and risk embracing the passion and mystery of religious
experience, we
may just turn into ignorant racists, or just lose it altogether.
And so, more like Peter before the
crucifixion than Christ, when the going gets tough, we often would like
to head
in the other direction. Or like Mary, who upon discovering the stone
rolled
away from the tomb, we would rather just stop right there, and maybe,
after
everyone leaves and nobody is looking, just sit down and cry by
ourselves. But
the Good News of the Gospel is that Christ is no longer in that dark
hole.
Mary finally gets the courage to look
in; she sees the burial clothes of Jesus and two angels. Why are you
crying,
they ask? Like so may in Guatemala, she logically thought he had been
disappeared. "Because they have taken away my Lord, and I do not know
where they have laid him." She turns around and sees Jesus, but doesn't
know it is him. She thinks she must be talking to the gardener.
By the way, Jesus has a new set of
clothes. Barbara Brown Taylor notes, "There is a naked gardener in this
story someplace. Either that or Jesus found the extra set of work
clothes down
by the fertilizer and the rakes. Peter and the beloved disciple saw
none of
this. They saw nothing but a vacant tomb with two piles of clothes in
it. They
saw nothing but emptiness and absence, in other words, and on that
basis at
least one of them believed." Though we are not told exactly what he
believes, and neither of them understood.
"Anyway you look at it, that is a
mighty fragile beginning for a religion that has lasted 2000 years
now."
(Brown Taylor, Barbara. Escape from the Tomb.
Christian Century, April
1, 1998 page 339). The
risen Christ's
first appearance is mistaken as the cemetery groundskeeper, a job for a
peasant
laborer, or a slave or an immigrant refugee, if there ever was one. You
might
think he would look like a king. This is one of those little mini
moments in a
story that carries the weight of a thousand words. The very fact that
Jesus,
the Son of God, is mistaken for the groundskeeper hallows the vocation
and
reveals a great deal about Christianity.
"Woman, why are you crying? Who
is it you are looking for," he asks. "Sir, if you have carried him
away, tell me where you have laid him, and I will get him." Jesus said
to
her, "Mary." She turned toward him and cried out,
"Rabonni." Here we expect a long embrace, but he says, "Mary, do
not hold onto me."
Here is another twist to our
resurrection story. Jesus has died and the risen Christ comes back. Yet
we
cannot hold onto him. We cannot keep him a certain way, in a certain
place,
with a certain look, even with a certain gender. On the one hand we can
have
this very specific and particular experience of the God incarnate. But
we cannot
hold only that image, the experience as if it were God for all time.
Some
people seem to hold onto Jesus, and his image and teaching become
mummified or
petrified. Instead of living love, Jesus too often becomes petrified
doctrine.
Or, we may hold him so long and so
tight, we don't let him do those things, which caused us to love him in
the
first place. One of the reasons I wanted to come to serve this church
was that
St. Johns was one of the founding members of the Sanctuary movement.
Back in
the 1980's tens of thousands of Guatemalans and Salvadorans were being
murdered
at the hands of US trained and supported death squads. As people fled
for their
lives to the United States, our government called them law-breakers and
illegal
aliens, and sent them back to face torture and death. St. John's said,
"Not if we have anything to do with it. God doesn't call them illegal.
In
God's eyes, our nation's support for state terrorism and genocide is
illegal.
As Christians, as American citizens, we are going to stand for
something
better." Other churches heard the call of the risen Lord and jumped on
board. In 1985 Christian Century called the Sanctuary movement the most
significant religious news story of the year.
But by the time I got here, Sanctuary
had developed more into a legal support system, the civil wars in
Central
America ended, St John's had grown a little older and intellectually
tight. And
holding onto the memories alone, even though wonderful, just didn't
seem to be
giving the church life.
The Tum family were among those who
were helped through the Sanctuary movement. Their village was burned,
their
elders raped and murdered, and they fled to the mountains, or to
Chiapas, and
eventually to the Bay Area. Years passed without knowing who among them
was dead
or alive. No doubt their family searched; they just wanted to know one
way or
the other who had taken them, where they had been laid. But they made
it here,
and met up with one another, got jobs as gardeners or custodians,
serving with
love the country that would have kept the stone over their path to a
new life.
Surely there is no going back to the
way it was before... before the crucifixion, before colonialism or
slavery,
before the burning, the pain and suffering and death, before our
complicity in
sin and evil. They are facts, and they should make us tremble. The evil
and
pain of the cross is not erased or denied by the resurrection; it is
surpassed
and overcome by forgiveness and hope, and by work for justice, equality
and
dignity for all people. Pain and suffering, anger and hate do not have
the last
word. Somehow grace carries us through to a new day, toward a new life
of joy
and peace.
Eventually the Tums who found refuge
here heard that their fellow remaining villagers went back to start a
new life.
It is tempting to want to hold onto this story, to hold onto them and
say,
"They are alive and we helped them. They are not in the tomb. Join us
to
tell this story of old."
But they said, don't hold onto me; we
have to unite with our God in heaven; we've got to go ahead to Galilee,
to
Xicaquic. We're going to help the people we left behind. They also need
to know
about new life."
And so it is that we too, on this
Easter morning here at St. John's, meet the risen Christ in a gardener,
and we
ourselves, giving thanks for, though not holding onto the past, move
out boldly
toward the future with new hope and life as a congregation. We can use
our
minds, our rational thought, our ethical systems, but God wants our
life, our
tears and our souls - God wants us to become a living part of the
story, this
miraculous story, the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
|