|
Sermons at St. John’s Presbyterian Church
Light
and Blindness in the Presbyterian Church
Transcribed from the sermon preached January 20, 2008 The Reverend Max Lynn,
Pastor St. John’s Presbyterian
Church Telephone 510-845-6830 Fax 510-845-6837 office@stjohns.presbychurch.net http://www.stjohns.presbychurch.net
Scripture Readings: Luke 6:36-42, John 9:1-25
The
regional governing body of our church, the presbytery of San Francisco, voted
last Tuesday night to accept our committee on preparation for Ministry's (CPM)
recommendation finding Lisa Larges "ready for examination [i.e. for
ordination], with a departure." The vote was very close: 167-151. The big issue was that Lisa declared a
"departure" from the Book of Order and the current standards of the
Presbyterian Church (USA). After years of conflicted debate at the national
level, the General Assembly gave jurisdiction on the issue of ordination to the
presbyteries. This would be like Washington telling the states they could make
their own decision about how to enforce a certain national law or standard.
This is a good move since it is at the presbytery level, in particular in the
committee on preparation for ministry, that a candidate for ministry is known
personally. All those on the CPM, including the group who brought the
minority report which moved to remove Lisa from the candidacy process once and
for all, agreed that Lisa has deep faith, a compassionate heart, a good sense
of humor and excellent preaching skills. Yet, at the same time the General Assembly sent
jurisdiction back to the presbyteries, it reaffirmed G-6.0106b, which states
"those who are called to office in the church are to lead a life in
obedience to Scripture and in conformity to the historic standards of the church.
Among these standards is the requirement to live either in fidelity within
marriage between a man and a woman, or chastity in singleness. Persons refusing
to repent of any self-acknowledged practice which the confessions call sin
shall not be ordained and/or installed as deacons, elders, or ministers of the
Word and Sacrament." In her statement of departure Lisa wrote, "I am
grateful for the church and its particular expression as the Presbyterian
Church (USA), for the ways in which it has taught me of the love of God, of the
work of salvation in Jesus Christ and of the demands on our lives to love and
serve one another and this sweet world. Even so, out of gratitude, love and
hope for the church, I am compelled by conscience and charged by faith to firmly,
clearly, and in every way declare that the provisions at G-6.0106b are a mar
upon the church and a stumbling block to its mission. As a matter of faith,
conscience and integrity I can neither actively concur nor passively submit to
this provision..." Lisa gives many reasons for her departure among which is
that the passage in question sets scripture and confessions above the authority
of Christ and "returns us to life under the law"... and "it
imposes false and impossible choice upon same gender loving persons by not
recognizing faithful covenanted relationships between two persons of the same
gender." I also might add, that in a motion made before the debate,
the body surprisingly voted to exclude the media from the sanctuary. The
so-called liberal media, for its part, seems to accept the conservative point
of view that the struggle is between those who are faithful to scripture and
those who want equal rights, as if there were no precedence in American
religious history or in scripture for movements toward greater justice and
inclusivty. I would argue that flexibility with the law in context is firmly
rooted in scripture, especially in the life and ministry of Jesus Christ. Homosexuals are not the only group, which has been excluded
from ministry on the basis of certain passages of scripture. We know that the
lame, blind and women were excluded from the priesthood and the temple, and
that gentiles were not considered a part of the covenant people of God. Quite
apart from her sexual orientation, if we were following the literal letter of
the law, Lisa, who is blind, female and a gentile would be ineligible for
ministry. From King David to Jesus' day, the blind and lame were considered
unclean and sinful as if their condition was punishment by God for some known
or unknown sin. Thus some of the disciples ask Jesus, "Rabbi, who
sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?" "Neither
this man nor his parents sinned," Jesus said. Jesus heals the man. Then
rather than being overjoyed that the Spirit of God had manifested itself in
giving sight to the blind, some Pharisees were blinded by the law and became
upset that Jesus had broken the law by healing on the Sabbath. They tried to get the man to testify against Jesus:
"We know this man is a sinner." The man with new sight replied,
"Whether he is a sinner I do not know. One thing I do know. I was blind
but now I see." Jesus himself sets precedence for grace with respect to our
understanding of the human condition, our understanding of scripture and for
the work and ministry of the Spirit. He doesn't start out his day thinking I am
going to uphold or break the law. He starts out with the intention to love, and
if he finds himself in a context where doing the loving thing is contrary to
the law, he will still do the loving thing. Let me make that plain and clear: the precedence for a
grace-filled evolution of our understanding and application of scripture and
moral law is set and demonstrated in scripture by Jesus himself. Those who do
not see this are blind. Love of law over the love of human beings is contrary
to the word of God who is Jesus Christ. Reformed or Presbyterian tradition has always acknowledged
the living Word of God (with a capital W) is Jesus Christ and the purpose of
scripture; the written word (small w) is to point to the light of God and the
Word who is Christ. We have also agreed with St. Anselm, that all truth is
God's truth. Scripture is our authority, for it points toward the saving truth
of the grace of God in Jesus Christ, but the light of God is not limited to
scripture or even to the church. Therefore it is no threat to our faith for science to fill
in the details of creation by showing us the evolution of life, or to discover
that the earth revolves around the sun or that blindness or homosexual
orientation can be caused by environmental and genetic factors irrespective of
the choice of the individual. To deny the value of these truths, to repress our God given
rational thought, our sense of compassion and justice because we are afraid
that our God is too small to handle it, is, quite literally, shutting out the
light and truth of God and becoming blind to the grace of our Lord Jesus
Christ. Perhaps it would not be so tragic if such people only chose
ignorance and blindness for themselves, but with arrogant conviction they teach
future generations that blindness is truth and that the Word of God is to be
petrified, locked in a tomb for safe keeping. Jesus spoke to those who were
more concerned with the letter of the law and lost sight of the purpose of the
law, which is to do good. He warned them against teaching this arrogant,
petrified faith. Do not judge and you will not be judged; forgive and you
will be forgiven. Can a blind man lead a blind man? A student is not above his
teacher, but everyone who is fully trained will be like his teacher. Why do you
look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye, and pay no attention to the
plank in your own eye? How can you say to your sister, let me take the speck
out of your eye, when you yourself fail to see the plank in your own eye? You
hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, then you will see clearly
to remove the speck from your neighbor's eye. The good news is that the Word of God is not petrified, the
Spirit of Jesus, his love, his grace, his truth is alive, the stone has been
rolled away, light shines in the darkness and the darkness has not overcome it.
I myself was lost. How is it
that I, a sinner, dare stand before you and proclaim the Word of God? All I can
say is, I once was blind, but now I see. Conservatives argue that the churches will die if we are
open and accepting of gays and lesbians. People will go to a church with a more
clear-cut understanding of morality and law. I think that if we maintain authentic
spirituality and relationship with God we will do just fine. Even so, it is
probably true that even when we open ourselves to authentic, personal
relationship with God, many have and will leave as we continue to choose to
include a group of people who has traditionally been excluded. In the 1970's when the minister of Christ Presbyterian
Church in San Leandro came out against discrimination against African Americans
in real estate, members left in droves. They were blinded by racism. Sadly
enough, today that church is but a remnant of its former self and may have to
close soon. Still, the minister and the members who stuck around give testimony
to the eternal light and love of God. Who knows, maybe those churches with a simpler, personal,
black and white morality will continue to grow, and we will eventually shrink
and die. All I have to say is, won't you join us? Join us as, by grace, we try
to honor the God of Love and discern morality within all the complexities
visible with our eyes wide open. Even as Lisa has taken another step toward
ordination, even as we grow as a congregation, there is sure to be appeals and
lawsuits. We have a long way to go. Martin Luther King Jr. speaking in Memphis just before he
was shot said, Well,
I don't know what will happen now. We've got some difficult days ahead. But it
really doesn't matter with me now, because I've been to the mountaintop and I
don't mind. Like anybody, I would like to live a long life. Longevity has its
place. But I'm not concerned about that now. I just want to do God's will, and
He's allowed me to go up to the mountain. And I've booked over and I've seen
the Promised Land. It is a privilege and an honor to be
here with you living true to the love of God. Whether we live or whether we
die, let us do so boldly, with the personal relationship with God and neighbor
and the strength of faith to carry our cross and follow Christ. We may be a
small community but let us resolve to love big. We know that in all things God works
for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his
purpose... Who will bring any charge against God's elect? If God is for us, who
can be against us? He who did not withhold his own son but gave him up for all
of us... Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall trouble or
hardship or persecution or famine or nakedness or danger or sword? No, in all
these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. For I am
convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the
present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything
else in all creation will be able to separate us from the love of God that is
in Christ Jesus our Lord. |